Permission has been granted...
A judge today rejected UMG’s motion to stay discovery in Drake’s lawsuit over Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us,” and Drake’s lawyers emailed me this celebratory press release.
— Meghann Cuniff (@meghanncuniff) April 2, 2025
“Now it's time to see what UMG was so desperately trying to hide.” pic.twitter.com/Z0LYAisUk8
As @innercitypress reported, Drake's lawyers say they're withdrawing allegations that UMG "conspired with and paid currently unknown parties to use 'bots'" to boost "Not Like Us."
— Meghann Cuniff (@meghanncuniff) April 2, 2025
From the complaint:https://t.co/s1YyJEE02L pic.twitter.com/M6pjwuo7WE
6 comments:
Drake still gonna look crazy when this is over.
This Megan lady needs to pay 50 cent for her little bet she made with him
Drake and his reputation is forever tainted.
Wow.
Incredibly ghey.
Like. What a beeyotch.
This means absolutely nothing. Just accept that you FAFO. You were not teflon Drake. Your songs were all starting to sound the same. You got involved in a beef that didn't concern you. Then you lost and lost big. UMG didn't need to distrubute it. Everyone was listening to it already. Take that L. If you won, you would be quiet. Keep making songs that make us wave our hands! Save your reputation and STOP now.
Drake needs to be careful FAing with these record companies. We already know what they'll do with the recent passing of beautiful Angie Stone and all the others before her. I may not be a fan, but I don't want to see anything untoward happen to him, because the record companies always win!
Post a Comment
Commenting Rules: Please watch your language. Disguise curse words if you must use them and do not threaten or attack other commenters.
Comments violating the rules will be deleted.