Saturday, February 15, 2025

Diddy and Jay Z Lawsuit Dismissed


Last year Bad Boy Entertainment CEO, Sean 'Diddy' Combs, and rapper, Jay Z, were hit with a civil lawsuit accusing them of rxping at 13-year-old girl [click here if you missed that]. 

The case has been dismissed...

From Variety
The lawsuit against Sean “Diddy” Combs and Jay-Z over the alleged rxpe of a 13-year-old girl in 2000 has been dismissed by the attorney representing the Jane Doe, according to a court filing made on Friday in New York.
The voluntary dismissal, reviewed by Variety, was filed by attorneys Tony Buzbee and Antigone Curis, claiming that the Jane Doe who accused the musicians of sixual assault “hereby gives notice that the above-captioned Action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice.” Because it was dismissed with prejudice, the suit cannot be refiled as it is in its present form.


53 comments:

Anonymous said...

As it should have been. The inconsistencies in her story were astronomical.

Karenda said...

There really needs to be consequences for filing all of these false claims. That goes for the lawyers and the accusers.

Anonymous said...

Pay Z Playing Connect Four

Anonymous said...

Great

Anonymous said...

There need to be consequences.

Anonymous said...

Diddy was damaged by this BS. The plaintiffs shouldn’t be able to just walk away like no harm no foul. There was harm in this matter. Definitely some defamation of character occurred. I surely don’t look at Diddy and Jay Z the same anymore

Anonymous said...

Whew.

Anonymous said...

At least they ain’t disappear him yet like Epstein. Who’s still alive I think.

Anonymous said...

Diddy if you ever see the light of day…. Flee to Bali.

Anonymous said...

Good for them.

Anonymous said...

999 problems. And this ain’t one.

Anonymous said...

👀👀

Anonymous said...

The Correct Wording is SETTLED!!! Still 2 philes.

Anonymous said...

10:15 you can't make up your on facts. Buzbee voluntarily dismissed the case. If it was settled it would say that.

Anonymous said...

This some BS. Damage was done with this BS.

Anonymous said...

LET'S BE REAL: THIS CASE WAS DROPPED TWO WEEKS AGO FOR BOTH SHAWN CARTER /SEAN COMBS.
Y'ALL WERE JUST CONFUSED BY THE LEGAL JARGON.
I SAID THIS WOULD HAPPEN & IT DID.
THE ACCUSER & THAT BUZBEE DUDE WERE NOT PREPARED TO TAKE THIS TO TRIAL THEY WERE PLAYING TENNIS IN A GLADIATOR SPORT!
I'M GLAD FOR BOTH JAY Z 7 PUFF.. FOR THIS CASE BEING DISMISSED.
LIFE GOES FORWARD....

Anonymous said...

Where all them folks last week that said this was a lie?

Anonymous said...

Screw Buzzbee.

Anonymous said...

let me get my Cowboy Carter tickets

Anonymous said...

Good.

Anonymous said...

11:18 ok? Arguing back n forth about the wording…now they’re on mute.

Anonymous said...

"Dismissed with prejudice" is the key phrase. Means the accuser can never file again. Usually that means a settlement took place. This is what ALL lawyers want.

Anonymous said...

I know j happy. One less problem.

Anonymous said...

Either that or the Defense attorneys threatened Countersuits against the lying Plaintiff, who cannot afford to pay, which is what I'm guessing.
This was never a actual case-just an accusation against Puff and JayZ. A judge was bound to dismiss it upon its arrival in their courtroom!
The Plaintiff had to Dismiss it before a judge embarrassed them by throwing it out for lack of evidence!

Anonymous said...

Again the last docment dropped charges against Bad Boy Records and not Jay Z. This one dropped it against Puff and Jay Z. Reading comprehension is important. If the last document said the charges against Jay Z was dropped this would be a redundant document. This is actually new information.

Anonymous said...

@ 11:39 Exactly

Anonymous said...

@1139. It usually means that. But, that’s not the case in this scenario. If money exchanged hands we would know about based off the NY law for victims. They would have to post Jay paid the money.

Anonymous said...

^ Nah not really. This was a private settlement and she now has the relief of not having to testify

Anonymous said...

Yes which is also why Jay Z dropped sanctions against Buzbee

Anonymous said...

12:18 P.M. Again, you were confused by the legal jargon! Both had been Dismissed. You'd have to know how the law works in order to understand it all.
You've been schooled Twice today!

Anonymous said...

Yall want jay to be guilty so bad I'm starting to think half the people in here are yt, stupid, or both

Anonymous said...

Naw, just some haters up in this piece!
I've always held that he wasn't guilty of this and that the accusation were str8ght up b.s. against Jay.
Never 1nce did I see him as somebody who would do what he was accused of to a child. It was a LIE all along!

Anonymous said...

Buzbee was loud as hell about the accusations why he aint make no announcement about the so called settlement if there was one while Jay calling his butt out?

Anonymous said...

The no child left behind act failed a lot of you it's really laughable. The other doc never said it was dismissed against Jay. Just wrong and strong.

Anonymous said...

^ It didn't fail at all. We're, or at least most of us, are going by simple common sense! This accusation made no sense whatsoever and was not reflecting the character of JayZ.
Stop wishing someone who wasn't guilty of what they were accused to be guilty simply because you was stupid enough to believe the accusation!

Anonymous said...

You are clearly wildly emotional. I have no dog in this fight and never said that Jay Z was guilty. I'm simply pointing out what the first document said and did not say. It was a simple 2 sentence document. Facts over feelings.

Anonymous said...

Facts OVER Feelings is what occurred in this situation! The Plaintiff didn't have a case to go forward on and basically had to Dismiss all accused parties. I'm annoyed mainly by your ignorance you brought on this blog.
Stop wishing Jay Z was guilty-Periodt!

Anonymous said...

Yeah IDGAF if you're annoyed! I'm actually concerned by your inability to read a 2 sentence document with sense. I'm not the only one posting comments saying the same thing. The case is NOW dismissed against Jay Z. That's the current story and good for him. All hot and bothered for what? Cuz you're illiterate? Not my problem dude.

Anonymous said...

&IDGAF about you concerns for no Bull Sh@t that don't concern the reasoning for being on this thread and this blog!
You need to go have a back and forth dialogue with whomever will GAF about your ignorant p.o.v that has nothing the fck to do with what ppl are commenting on!
You sound fucking deranged, 2:06 P.M. Go ask your Psych for a refill on your meds!

Anonymous said...

@2:06-The f**king BottomLine is :JAY MFING Z IS FREE ASF RIGHT NOW & YOU WILL HAVE TO DEAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

its a reason Buzbee got his instagram comments turned off right now and its not because of his "victory" over jay z that he hasnt bothered to mention btw

Anonymous said...

Literally calls out people who said something in the last post and then mad they responded. You're the one who's deranged and and forgot to take your schizo meds. Illiterate and unstable.

Anonymous said...

IF it was settled it would say settled, and with NY law as some one mentioned, we would be able to see settled even if it was a private settlement, the filed case would still reflect that. The amount would be redacted but we would see everything else otherwise.

So... NO money was exchanged "legally". Now off the books who knows. But the way Jay bragging and going in on this lawyer I would say the case fell apart. Since Buzbee who loves attention not gloating and showboating I would say his pride hurt, and now he about to leave Jay alone but go harder on the one he already got in jail and that's Diddy. 💯Now I wonder if that alleged victim is stuck with legal costs or Buzbee did it for the clout that didn't work out.

Anonymous said...

For all the idiots saying he settled, do better. How is this a settlement when there was no money exchanged ("not one red cent") and Jay is still suing Buzbee? Make it make sense.

Anonymous said...

What are y'all arguing bout? It's clear as day the first dismissal was for Bad Boy LLC and this one was voluntarily dismissed. It doesn't mean she didn't have a case. Like someone said this is what most lawyers want.

Anonymous said...

Except Tony Buzbee wanted more than what occurred.
JayZ taking him to task for even bringing this to the attention of the media with false claims. Both cases were DROPPED and Dismissed. I read about JayZ's case being Dismissed on a different site before Buzbee announced the one against BadBoy being Dismissed.
Buzbee didn't want either case Dismissed w/o a huge payout which he never obtained from JayZ or Diddy.
He simply did not have a case to take to court before a judge-Period Point Blank!

Anonymous said...

Buzbee silent because he trying to figure out how is going to get paid. Diddy just know he is going to empty the clip on you on the other cases because Jay got away. 💯

Anonymous said...

Paid.

Anonymous said...

Sloan Bella was right, jay z will be able to skirt his illegal activities but they will disappear him and his new white looking wife

Anonymous said...

No one knows what you're referencing because you're talking crazy!

Anonymous said...

Jay paid for that Grammy, this settlement, his lawyers; now go buy 100k concert tickets so he can get it back

Anonymous said...

We wouldn’t believe it if it aren’t for his reputation:

“Rap e and pillage your village, women and children” -Jay z

Now justice for Rymir, his secret son

Anonymous said...

You reachin', 11:35 pm!
Just like Bob Marley's infamous "I Shot the Sheriff. But I Did Not Shoot the Deputy" were just lyrics for the poet and prophet Bob Marley.

Post a Comment

Commenting Rules: Please watch your language. Disguise curse words if you must use them and do not threaten or attack other commenters.

Comments violating the rules will be deleted.