Thursday, January 23, 2025

Jeannie Mai Calls the Cops In Jeezy Dispute


Last month rapper Young Jeezy told the court he did not feel safe with his estranged wife, Jeannie Mai, walking around his home to retrieve her belongings, after she submitted home surveillance video to the court claiming he walked around the house carrying guns [click here if you missed that]. 

Jeannie ends up calling the cops after accusing Jeezy of damaging her things...
Jeannie Mai showed up to ex-husband Jeezy’s home to collect boxes of personal items from the home they once shared but had to call police after she was refused entry, In Touch can exclusively report.
According to court documents obtained by In Touch, Jeannie, 46, said the drama with Jeezy, 47, started back in November 2024. The exes initially settled their divorce in June 2024.
A couple of months later, Jeannie said she had items that she needed to pick up from Jeezy’s home in Georgia.
Jeezy (real name: Jay Jenkins) said he placed Jeannie’s property, which included her Emmy and other trophies, photos, handbags, shoes and other items in boxes. The judge ruled that Jeannie could pick up the items within 21 days from Jeezy’s home.
However, Jeezy asked the court to modify the court due to him not feeling safe with Jeannie roaming around his home.
Now, Jeannie fired back at Jeezy’s claims he doesn’t feel safe in his home.
She said her lawyers notified Jeezy she would be coming to his home on December 9, 2024.
She claimed Jeezy said he had no objections to her coming to pick up her items that were packed and in his garage. Jeannie said her lawyers asked for confirmation that Jeezy was going to allow Jeannie inside the home.
Jeannie’s lawyers said their client had no intention of invading Jeezy’s privacy or placing any recording devices in the home — and that she simply wanted to make sure she didn’t leave anything behind. Jeannie said she arrived on December 9, 2024, with her movers at Jeezy’s home.
She said Jeezy’s house manager, “on the orders of [Jeezy]”, refused to allow her and her security team to access the garage, where her items were stored.”
"The house manager continued to refuse to let [Jeannie] and her movers access the garage; in fact the house manager called [Jeezy], who again confirmed that [Jeannie] and her movers were not to access her items, disregarding the court order entirely,” the motion read.
“At this time, [Jeannie] called the Atlanta Police Department, who came to the property to gather a report on [Jeannie’s] denial of access. [Jeannie] as always was the consummate professional,” Jeannie’s lawyer wrote.
“The police were not called to make a scene but instead to report that the court order was being violated.”
"When the police officer informed the house manager that a court order was, in fact, being violated, the house manager then had to shift gears and create a new barrier to entry. Next, the house manager, at the direction of [Jeezy], refused to allow anyone on behalf of [Jeannie] to enter the home unless they signed a nondisclosure agreement. To note, there is nothing in the court order that states any language regarding a nondisclosure agreement,” Jeannie’s lawyer wrote.
Jeannie said when she was allowed in the garage she saw her boxes had been damaged. She said Jeezy’s lawyer previously praised the rapper in court for the “condition in which he maintained” her belongings. Jeannie said her items, which carried “immeasurable personal value,” were left in disarray.
“The boxes were wet, with water having soaked through the boxes, damaging personal items. There were mouse traps set in the garage, presumably set for mice which had eaten through some of the boxes,” Jeannie’s lawyer wrote. “Many of [Jeannie’s] awards were broken and scratched,” the lawyer continued.
Jeannie said Jeezy had caused her to incur significant legal bills due to his refusal to abide by “any court order.” Jeannie denied she was “angry” and “revengeful” following the split.
Her lawyer wrote, “The only party that seems to be angry or revengeful is [Jeezy].” A judge has yet to rule on the back on forth.

No comments:

Post a Comment