Saturday, December 21, 2024

Jay Z Demands All Buzbee Evidence


Last week Houston attorney Tony Buzbee filed a lawsuit accusing Bad Boy Entertainment CEO, Sean 'Diddy' Combs, and Roc Nation founder, Jay Z, of rxping a 13-year-old girl 24 years ago [click here if you missed that].

Now Jay is demanding Buzbee turn over all his evidence...



24 comments:

Anonymous said...

I hope this Buzbee dude gets everything coming to him.

Anonymous said...

Only hit Dogs Holla Jigga man...

Anonymous said...

Jay be trying the case in the court of public opinion. It don't be going away though.

Anonymous said...

I think if the girl was lying her lawyer would've surely been present at the interview.

Anonymous said...

This sleazebag lawyer got nothing!

Anonymous said...

1 of the dumbest comments I've ever heard is "A Hit Dog Will Holler/Holla"
Because if you think about it in a pack of dogs they all will bark once one of them is hurt/hit because they all feel under attack.
Smart folks, let that simmer on your mind(s)....

Anonymous said...

buzbee started it with the trying the case in public stuff.
what type of lawyer talks with TMZ before going to trial? he getting what he asked for.

Anonymous said...

Nah, I’m with the A hit dog will holler commenter.

Jay has never responded to accusations before but he responds to this. His having a part in Aaliyah’s death warranted a comment but he stayed silent. Jay and Hype and planned it. Lenny Kravitz wanted Aaliyah to use his plane but Hype demanded she used the plane with everyone else.
In Nas Ether voice ……F’CK JAY Z!!!

Anonymous said...

Can one of the resident legal eagles pls explain #1A under the Table of Contents? If the accusation is false, why are they asking for evidence to be preserved?

Anonymous said...

STFU, @1:34P.M.!!!!! You Full of $hit!!!!!!!!!!!
JZ and Hype Williams didn't plan $hit! The pilot piloting that small engine plane was High ASF and crashed the plane everybody on board died!
Stop being a D!CK and quit spreading lies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

2:08 take a breath

Anonymous said...

@11:19 AM It's only one hit dog and it's Jigga,he can't shut up!

Anonymous said...

^Um, Duh! Yeah he can't shut up b/c JZ's being targeted!
That both was and wasn't the point!

Anonymous said...

@4:47 pm.
Tell @1:34pm that $hit and while yr @ it, tell them to Stop Spreading Lies when they dont know what they're talking about!
If you're 1:34, Then STFU!

Anonymous said...

@5:44P.M. If "it's only one hit dog " Then Common sense says IT WILL HOLLER WHEN HIT, and that means the comment "A hit dog will holler/holla" makes no fricking sense.

Anonymous said...

^You've got a point
The phrase indicates that there's a pack of dogs and whichever one is hit is the one who felt the pain. So, that makes this overused phrase on this blog inefficient as well as wrongly used when "it's only one hit dog". Of course one hit dog will holla when it's hurt.
Take Notes, @8:14 and @5:44!

Anonymous said...

My Pre-law knowledge is a little rusty, @2:00 P.M., but it appears they're making the case that Buzbee could attempt to negate the fact that his own client is lying about what occurred during a party she obviously didn't attend. In 1A,They're concerned that Buzbee could "fill in" key events in his client's 'recollections' to save face for the client's lack of remembering who was at the event and what may have occurred and with whom it happened with.
Summary Judgment means for lack of a better term it could be cause for Dismissal for Jay Z or a Continuance to Pursue going before a judge, who may decide if there's enough evidence to move forward or Dismiss.
I hope that helps.

Anonymous said...

1:23 PM ...ummmTMZ is a very credible news source..🫣

Anonymous said...

^The point being: Attorneys with an official case against a celebrity and believable clients DO NOT speak with media blogs in order to get their cases heard before a court. They present their cases in a court forum-not to the media.

Anonymous said...

Thanks at 8:20. His letter to the judge is interesting. He cites cases showing it's not expected for victims to have 100% recollection. I think it's at the top of page 2.

Anonymous said...

^It sounds like this predatory scumbag lawyer doesn't care about his client's well-being in the long run because without "100% Recollection" you really don't have much of a case leaving room for error that may benefit the defense.
If there's room for error the defense could completely eviscerate the 'victim' if she takes the stand.

Gg57 said...

"Nah, I’m with the A hit dog will holler commenter.

Jay has never responded to accusations before but he responds to this. "



Are you an idiot? Why wouldnt he respond to a lawsuit? Nobody wants to end up like dmbaaas "Game" and lose their house to a scammer.

Anonymous said...

@11:19AM I said it on here before. You got a problem with it? Something yo n!gg@ f0lks on here say defending beyonce with they br0ke azzes. What the d@mn difference from when I said it from the time these deprived neh-g0s who look up to the wrong sh!t with they dumb azzes cause they ain't had nothing so they fell for the okie doke from the bey PR I'm down with my black skin like I never looked down on my people before propaganda. You all so slow it aint't nothing to laugh on. Like Geesh, with all the wonders and signs humanly possible from Cov!d to celebrities predictions that maybe, maybe everybody ain't no fluke. You the type that neeeeva could get a relationship right. The carters played ya'll all to the h#ll the running to and you talk alot of ish to be not worried with going there. BYE B!CH!

Anonymous said...

And I'm going to pray everyday that this site and Sandra Rose site gets shut down!!!!!!

Post a Comment

Commenting Rules: Please watch your language. Disguise curse words if you must use them and do not threaten or attack other commenters.

Comments violating the rules will be deleted.